HUD reopens the homelessness policy fight
A new Federal Register notice puts transitional housing, treatment-linked services, sober housing and public-safety partnerships back at the center of a multibillion-dollar grant debate. A federal judge forced HUD to use notice-and-comment first. Now the country gets a formal chance to answer.
The reset
A grant-rule fight has become a public policy argument
On September 11, HUD published a Federal Register notice asking for comment on homelessness strategies it may reward in future Continuum of Care competitions. The move is a procedural reset after a federal judge set aside HUD’s June FY2026 funding notice.
Judge Mary S. McElroy ruled on August 7 that HUD had not completed a required notice-and-comment step before creating the challenged transitional-housing and supportive-services set-aside. The court vacated the NOFO but did not decide the larger policy dispute over Housing First, treatment or recovery models. HUD appealed and says it disagrees with the ruling.
HUD’s competition page says the vacated FY2026 NOFO and its former August 26 deadline are no longer in force. The new comment process closes October 13.
The September notice is therefore not a revived grant competition. It is the record-building step HUD says it will use before adopting or revising its determinations in future funding opportunities.
The five priorities
HUD wants to reward a broader mix of housing and services
The notice identifies five areas for possible bonuses or incentives. HUD stresses that these are already eligible CoC activities or models; the proposed change is to give them more competitive weight.
Transitional housing plus services
Time-limited housing paired with employment, behavioral-health, substance-use and case-management support.
Supportive-services-only projects
Stand-alone health, employment, legal, child-care, treatment and outreach services for people in shelters or on the street.
Service participation agreements
Programs that use participation requirements tied to supportive services and self-sufficiency goals.
Drug-free and sober housing
Housing environments designed to support recovery, with sober housing carrying stronger abstinence expectations.
First responders and law enforcement
Partnerships intended to identify people in crisis and connect them with services, shelter, treatment or housing.
The missing detail is the scoring math. The notice does not restore applications or specify how large future bonuses and set-asides will be. Those numbers will determine whether HUD is diversifying the system or substantially reordering it.
The central question is no longer whether housing or services matter. Both do. The fight is over sequence, conditions, target populations and which outcomes federal dollars should reward.
How we got here
Housing First became a political target while homelessness stayed high
HUD’s 2025 count found 745,652 people experiencing homelessness on one night, including 266,320 people who were unsheltered. The total fell about 3 percent from 2024 but remained 27 percent above 2013. HUD uses that long rise to argue that federal policy became too concentrated on permanent housing.
The new notice says transitional housing and supportive-services-only projects fell from 36 percent of the national CoC award in 2009 to 6 percent in 2024, while permanent-housing capacity expanded and transitional capacity fell sharply. Those trends show a real portfolio shift, but they do not prove Housing First caused the national increase; housing costs, supply, the pandemic, migration, income shocks and the fentanyl crisis also changed over the period.
HUD announces $4.04 billion
The FY2026 competition emphasizes recovery, treatment and a larger role for transitional housing.
Court vacates the NOFO
The Rhode Island court finds a required procedural step was missing.
Formal comment begins
HUD publishes its research notice and opens the record through October 13.
The evidence ledger
Research strongly supports housing stability, while other outcomes are more mixed
A Community Guide review of 26 U.S. and Canadian studies found Housing First produced a median 88 percent greater reduction in homelessness and 41 percent greater improvement in housing stability compared with Treatment First or usual care among people with disabling conditions. A randomized-trial meta-analysis also found better housing stability and lower emergency-department and hospital use, but no clear difference in substance use.
A 2026 review of nine controlled studies involving 6,039 participants again found that housing interventions consistently improved housing stability and reduced returns to homelessness, while mental-health and functional outcomes varied. That evidence supports Housing First for the outcome it was built to change, but it also explains why providers argue that stable housing must be paired with high-quality clinical and social services.
Housing stability
Low-barrier permanent housing reliably improves whether people become and remain housed.
Health and substance use
Some service-use outcomes improve, but mental-health and substance-use results are less uniform.
Who needs which model?
Families, youth, people with severe mental illness and people seeking sobriety may need different pathways.
Recovery and conditions
Sober housing can be a needed option without becoming the only gate to housing
HUD distinguishes drug-free housing, which bars illicit drug use or distribution on site, from sober housing for people in recovery who commit to abstinence and recovery supports. That distinction matters: many people actively want a recovery-centered environment.
The controversy begins when choice becomes a condition. Housing First evidence shows that removing sobriety or treatment prerequisites can be unusually effective at ending the immediate state of homelessness. A flexible system can offer both low-barrier permanent housing and structured recovery options instead of forcing every person through the same door.
Public safety
First-responder partnerships will be judged by what happens after contact
HUD also wants to reward coordination among CoCs, police, firefighters, paramedics and other public-safety agencies. Better handoffs can connect a person in crisis to treatment, shelter or housing instead of repeating an emergency loop. But homelessness is not itself a crime, and trust can be damaged if outreach becomes indistinguishable from enforcement.
What changes locally
The same federal incentive will land differently across America
Continuums of Care rank projects in housing markets that bear little resemblance to one another. High-cost cities may still face an apartment shortage; rural regions may lack treatment providers; recovery-focused networks may welcome new flexibility; systems with large permanent-supportive-housing portfolios will worry about renewal stability.
Capacity
Buildings, clinicians and case managers cannot appear as quickly as federal scoring can change.
Continuity
Existing residents need protection while communities test or build new models.
People, not models
Homelessness is not one population with one cause
Families displaced by rent, people with severe mental illness, veterans, youth, survivors of violence and people seeking recovery move through different systems. A durable federal strategy should preserve low-barrier housing where it works while making treatment, case management, recovery housing and transitional programs genuinely available for people who need or want them.
The budget reality
Every new priority competes with an existing obligation
The June NOFO’s $4.04 billion headline is large, but CoC dollars already support thousands of projects. HUD argues that a renewal-heavy system can freeze out innovation; providers answer that renewals are what keep people housed. If future incentives rely mainly on reallocating existing money, HUD will need clear transition rules and outcome standards.
The comment period
Four questions matter before October 13
- How large will future bonuses or set-asides be?
- How will renewals be protected during a transition?
- Which outcomes will count as success?
- What safeguards will accompany participation requirements and public-safety partnerships?
Notice-and-comment is not a referendum, but it forces HUD to put evidence and objections into the administrative record before using its determinations in future funding. Meanwhile, the appeal can proceed on a separate track; as of September 12, the old FY2026 competition remains vacated.
Bottom line
The test is whether HUD broadens choice without replacing one orthodoxy with another
Permanent housing is not the only intervention a functioning homelessness system needs. Communities also need treatment, recovery support, outreach, employment help and transitional options. But Housing First research shows that removing treatment or sobriety prerequisites has strong, repeatable benefits for housing stability.
The strongest version of HUD’s reset would reward measurable outcomes and population-specific choices. The weakest would simply reverse the hierarchy, shifting scarce dollars toward new conditions before communities have the capacity or evidence to use them safely. The next funding notice will reveal which path HUD chooses.
Quick answers
What readers should know
Did the court rule that Housing First is legally required?
No. The August 7 order set aside HUD’s FY2026 NOFO because of a procedural problem under federal law and the Administrative Procedure Act. The court did not resolve the broader merits dispute over whether Housing First or treatment-oriented approaches are better policy.
Has HUD restored the FY2026 grant competition?
No. HUD’s competition page says the vacated NOFO and former August 26 deadline are no longer in force. The September 11 notice is a public-comment process about activities HUD may incentivize in future funding opportunities.
Is HUD banning Housing First?
The September notice does not itself ban Housing First. It argues for bonuses and incentives for additional models and services. The practical effect will depend on the scoring, set-asides and renewal rules in a future funding notice.
When are comments due?
October 13, 2026. The notice is docket FR-6628-N-01 and Federal Register document 2026-18555.
Primary sources and research
- Federal Register, “Research Justifying Additional Incentives for Certain Activities to Reduce Homelessness,” September 11, 2026.
- HUD, FY2026 Continuum of Care Program Competition and court-order update.
- HUD, June 1, 2026 announcement of the $4.04 billion FY2026 CoC competition.
- HUD, 2025 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report release, May 29, 2026.
- U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, August 7, 2026 memorandum and order.
- Community Guide systematic review of permanent supportive housing with Housing First.
- Randomized-trial systematic review and meta-analysis of Housing First health and housing outcomes.
- 2026 systematic review of recent controlled housing and harm-reduction evidence.
Comments
Post a Comment